Including opportunities for growth challenges existing skill sets encourages maturation and progress towards sophisticated end products suitable for competition-level showcasing.

Avoiding consideration of personal progression simplifies immediate task completion at the expense of enriching the educational experience and building towards advanced placement expectations and standards.

Disregarding ongoing advancement stifles creativity and confines learners to narrow scopes of possible expression, limiting the evolution of individual distinctive voices heard within the community of peers and professionals alike.

Ignoring the need for growth makes it easier to immediately satisfy project guidelines, sacrificing long-term development potential for polished collections in later stages of education programs.