APFIVE Which of the following conclusions is best supported by the evidence that a solution with a concentration of $$0.1\ M$$ and a path length of $$1\ cm$$ exhibits an absorbance of $$0.5$$ according to Beer’s Law?
By rearranging Beer’s Law $$A = a*b*c$$, the molar absorptivity is calculated as $$a = \frac{A}{b*c} = \frac{0.5}{1*0.1} = 5\ L/(mol\cdot cm)$$.
The measured absorbance supports a conclusion that the concentration must be increased to achieve a molar absorptivity of at least 10 L/(mol·cm).
An absorbance of 0.5 under these conditions suggests that the path length is insufficient to capture the true concentration of the solution.
The absorbance value indicates that the solution has an unusually low molar absorptivity, implying weak light absorption.
Question Leaderboard
| Rank | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | kayla.smith | 1 | 1 | 0m 38s | 62 |
| #2 | Derinchiay2013 | 1 | 1 | 0m 40s | 60 |
| #3 | 27mbull | 1 | 1 | 8m 30s | -410 |
| #4 | srinikasriyamathur | 0 | 1 | 1h 01m | -3,671 |