APFIVE Responding to Contradictory Evidence
In response to counterarguments based on newly emerged scientific research contradicting an author’s position on climate change, what should be done first?
A
Assess whether refuting or accommodating this new research strengthens one’s rhetorical appeal.
B
Introduce anecdotal examples as a way to diminish reliance on empirical data altogether.
C
Undermine the validity of scientific methods used in producing counterargumentative research.
D
Immediately alter one’s stance in light of new findings without further investigation.
Question Leaderboard
| Rank | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | haydenfung7 | 1 | 1 | 0m 00s | 100 |
| #2 | zoeyefisher | 1 | 1 | 0m 18s | 82 |
| #3 | rokutvxy | 0 | 2 | 0m 00s | -20 |
Items per page:
10
1 – 3 of 3