APFIVE Responding to Contradictory Evidence
If presented with empirical studies that invalidate a key example in their argument, how should an author proceed rhetorically?
A
Replace or revise the flawed example while maintaining coherence within their overall line of reasoning.
B
Emphasize anecdotal instances that support their claim, overlooking broader empirical discrepancies.
C
Focus on questioning the methodology behind contradicting empirical studies instead of correcting examples provided originally.
D
Highlight unrelated strengths in different parts of their work without addressing flaws in examples.
Question Leaderboard
Not enough data yet to show leaderboard.