Given that both writers decry the decadence of authorities, neither appears inclined toward advocating change, preferring simply to record transgressions for posterity’s judgment alone.

While detailing the debauchery of rulerships, each holds an optimistic view of possible redemption, therefore gently coaxing the populace to consider avenues for possible improvement within the status quo, rather than outright revolt or calls to action.

Although critical of figures of authority, Sallust is more taciturn in his details, expecting the reader to derive conclusions, in contrast to Tacitus who is more forthright in his proposed solutions to societal issues faced by the Empire at that period of time.

Sallust exposes corruption endemic in the senatorial class, offering explicit condemnation and striving to incite reform, whereas Tacitus documents the misdeeds of emperors subtly, hinting at the need for vigilance among the citizenry.