APFIVE Gauging Progress in Scholarly Argumentation
What mechanisms could effectively gauge an author’s progress development during iterative cycles reflection revision scholarly argumentation?
A
Implementation of formative peer feedback using rubrics aligned with key elements of effective argumentation
B
Solicitation of external expert opinions concerning the quality and rigorousness of arguments presented
C
Quantitative metrics such as text length, word choice, complexity analyses, revisions
D
Frequent self-evaluations based on personal goals and pre-determined benchmarks of progress
Question Leaderboard
Not enough data yet to show leaderboard.