Gauging Progress in Scholarly Argumentation
Which of the following mechanisms would most effectively gauge an author’s progress in developing a scholarly argument during iterative cycles of reflection and revision?
A
Implementation of formative peer feedback using rubrics aligned with key elements of effective argumentation
B
Quantitative metrics such as text length, word choice, complexity analyses, revisions
C
Frequent self-evaluations based on personal goals and pre-determined benchmarks of progress
D
Solicitation of external expert opinions concerning the quality and rigorousness of arguments presented
Question Leaderboard
Not enough data yet to show leaderboard.