| preferred AP College board partner for AP classes
medium Solved by 1 students
Flawed Confidence Interval Interpretation
< Prev
Next >

A study compared the daily calcium intake (in mg) of vegetarian and non-vegetarian adolescents. A random sample of 45 vegetarian adolescents and 52 non-vegetarian adolescents was selected. A 90% confidence interval for the difference in mean daily calcium intake (non-vegetarian minus vegetarian) was (-42, 156). Which statement contains a critical flaw in the interpretation of this confidence interval?

A

90% of all confidence intervals constructed in this manner will contain the true difference in mean daily calcium intake between the two populations.

B

We are 90% confident that vegetarian adolescents consume between 42 mg less and 156 mg more calcium daily than non-vegetarian adolescents.

C

We are 90% confident that the difference in mean daily calcium intake between the two samples is between -42 mg and 156 mg.

D

We are 90% confident that the mean daily calcium intake for non-vegetarian adolescents is between 42 mg less and 156 mg more than for vegetarian adolescents in the populations from which these samples were drawn.

Hint
Did You Know?
Explain Why
Explain All Answers
Check Answer
Show Correct Answer
Report Question

Question Leaderboard

Not enough data yet to show leaderboard.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

AI Tutor

How can I help?

APFIVE © 2020.
Email: [email protected]|Privacy Policy