A teacher compares the test scores of 30 students before and after a review session. Rather than analyzing the difference for each student, the teacher calculates separate confidence intervals for the pre-test and post-test scores and then subtracts these intervals to estimate the improvement. What mistake is made in this process and what is the correct approach?
Paired Data Example:
| Student | Pre-test Score | Post-test Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 68 | 75 |
| 2 | 70 | 78 |
| … | … | … |
The error is in calculating means instead of medians; paired data should be analyzed using medians.
There is no mistake; subtracting the independent confidence intervals yields the correct confidence interval for improvement.
The mistake is treating paired data as if they were from independent samples; the proper approach is to compute the difference for each student and perform a one-sample t-interval on these differences.
The mistake is in using a t-distribution; a z-distribution should be used when sample sizes are large.
Question Leaderboard
Not enough data yet to show leaderboard.
APFIVE