APFIVE Heller Dissent and the Second Amendment
Which of the following best describes the argument of the dissenting justices in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) regarding the majority’s interpretation of the Second Amendment?
A
As not expanding individual rights broadly enough
B
As misreading history to create a new individual right
C
As correctly interpreting but improperly applying the right
D
As unnecessarily limiting state police powers