APFIVE Heller Dissent and the Second Amendment
Which of the following best describes the argument of the dissenting justices in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) regarding the majority’s interpretation of the Second Amendment?
A
As misreading history to create a new individual right
B
As not expanding individual rights broadly enough
C
As unnecessarily limiting state police powers
D
As correctly interpreting but improperly applying the right
Question Leaderboard
| Rank | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 56369 | 1 | 1 | 0m 20s | 80 |
| #2 | kairace | 1 | 3 | 2m 29s | -69 |
| #3 | tabithad09 | 1 | 4 | 3m 55s | -165 |
Items per page:
10
1 – 3 of 3