Contesting The Fugitive Slave Law
Senator John Calhoun, a staunch defender of states’ rights and slavery, argued that the Fugitive Slave Law was both morally sound and constitutionally justified. Which piece of specific historical evidence contradicts Calhoun’s argument?
A
The integration of fugitive slave cases into the federal judicial system, which affirmed its legality.
B
The enactment of personal liberty laws in Northern states, which directly challenged the Fugitive Slave Law as immoral and unjust.
C
The strong support for the Fugitive Slave Law in Southern states, reflecting widespread regional consensus.
D
The enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Law by federal troops, demonstrating its constitutional basis.
Question Leaderboard
| Rank | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | ninalvienne | 1 | 1 | 0m 00s | 100 |
| #2 | kingmadyson394 | 1 | 1 | 0m 15s | 85 |
| #3 | 27rstewart | 1 | 1 | 0m 57s | 43 |
Items per page:
10
1 – 3 of 3
APFIVE