| preferred AP College board partner for AP classes
medium Solved by 12 students
Contesting The Fugitive Slave Law
< Prev
Next >

Senator John Calhoun, a staunch defender of states’ rights and slavery, argued that the Fugitive Slave Law was both morally sound and constitutionally justified. Which piece of specific historical evidence contradicts Calhoun’s argument?

A

The integration of fugitive slave cases into the federal judicial system, which affirmed its legality.

B

The enactment of personal liberty laws in Northern states, which directly challenged the Fugitive Slave Law as immoral and unjust.

C

The strong support for the Fugitive Slave Law in Southern states, reflecting widespread regional consensus.

D

The enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Law by federal troops, demonstrating its constitutional basis.

Hint
Did You Know?
Explain Why
Explain All Answers
Check Answer
Show Correct Answer
Report Question

Question Leaderboard

Rank
User
Correct Count
Attempt Count
Time
Score
#1ninalvienne11 0m 00s 100
#2kingmadyson39411 0m 15s 85
#327rstewart11 0m 57s 43
Items per page:
10
1 – 3 of 3
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

AI Tutor

How can I help?

APFIVE © 2020.
Email: [email protected]|Privacy Policy