Post-WWI Perspectives On Nationalism
England is the educator. The patriotism that the English have taught us, the patriotism that all civilized nations have celebrated—that patriotism is responsible for all this bloodshed. We see now that all that patriotism means is snatching away another man’s country. To show patriotism, nationalism, by killing thousands and thousands of people all to snatch away a bit of land, well it’s the English who have taught us this.HTMLBREAKThe youths of our country, seeing this, have started to practice this brutal form of nationalism. Therefore, killing a number of people, throwing bomb —they have started doing these horrific things. Shame on patriotism. As long as this narrow-mindedness continues, bloodshed in the name of patriotism will not cease. Whether a man throws a bomb from the rooftop or whether fifty men, under orders from their officer, start firing from a cannon-gun at the front line—the cause of this bloodshed, this madness, is the same.
The perspective on nationalism expressed in the letter is best understood as a reflection of which post-First World War global trend?
A
Evidences a profound critique of nationalism’s violent implications.
B
Indicates a shift towards pacifism as an alternative to nationalism.
C
Implies a call for global disarmament as a response to nationalist violence.
D
Suggests optimism towards nationalism’s unifying potential post-WWI.
Question Leaderboard
Not enough data yet to show leaderboard.
