Contrasting Nazi and Soviet Strategies
Soviet power, unlike that of Hitlerite Germany, is neither schematic nor adventunstic. It does not work by fixed plans. It does not take unnecessary risks. Impervious to logic of reason, and it is highly sensitive to logic of force. For this reason it can easily withdraw--and usually does when strong resistance is encountered at any point. Thus, if the adversary has sufficient force and makes clear his readiness to use it, he rarely has to do so. If situations are properly handled there need be no prestige-engaging showdowns.HTMLBREAK...Gauged against Western World as a whole, Soviets are still by far the weaker force. Thus, their success will really depend on degree of cohesion, firmness and vigor which Western World can muster. And this is factor which it is within our power to influence.
Which of the following statements best describes a contrast between the strategies of Nazi Germany and the approach outlined in the excerpt?
A
Hitlerite strategies involved taking significant risks for gains.
B
Germany, like the USSR, avoided direct confrontations when opposed.
C
The excerpt suggests Germany was more militarily powerful than the USSR.
D
Both powers shared a disregard for logic and a focus on force.
Question Leaderboard
Not enough data yet to show leaderboard.